Goods and Services Tax

M/s Chavan Autowheels Pvt. Ltd., M/s Chavan Motor Div. (I) , Pvt. Ltd. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

2019 (2) TMI 427 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI – IT-grievance redressal mechanism – Circular No.39/13/2018-GST dated 03.04.2018 issued by CBIC – Held that:- The respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 7 will ensure that the Commissioner, second respondent, meets the petitioner or its representatives on Monday i.e. 11th February, 2018 at 11.30 a.m. and will ensure that the petitioner’s grievances are redressed – matter posted for “Passing Orders” on 14th February, 2018. – WRIT PETITION NO.713 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.716 OF 2019 Dated:- 8-2-2019 – S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. Mr. Chandrakant B. Thakar for the Petitioner. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for respondent Nos.3 to 6. Ms. S.D. Vyas, B Panel Counsel for State- Resp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erroe during submission of the form-reg. I am directed to refer your letter dated 19.10.2018 on the above subject and to inform that a IT-grievance redressal mechanism is set up in terms of a Circular No.39/13/2018-GST dated 03.04.2018 issued by CBIC. Accordingly, you may file your IT related grievance through field officer or nodal officer of your jurisdiction, for consideration of your grievance by IT-Grievance Redressal Committee. Hence your letter dated 19.10.2018 is returned herewith, in original. (Arjun Kumar Meena) Deputy Commissioner to GST Council Encl : As above. 3. Then, Mr. Jetly says that this is possibly not a grievance against the Central machinery, but the State GST Officials. 4. In that regard, we find that respondent No.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply