Goods and Services Tax

Deemed stay on disputed interest recovery applies after full tax payment while appellate proceedings remain pending.
Case-Laws
GST
Under the statutory appellate pre-deposit scheme, where the entire underlying tax has been paid, no percentage-based pre-deposit of disputed interest is required. Compliance with applicable pre-deposit conditions results in a deemed stay of recovery of the balance demand while the appeal remains pending. Recovery communications for disputed interest, consequential bank notices, and bank restrictions are therefore barred during that period and must be withdrawn. The basis and computation of the interest demand remain open for determination in the pending appellate proceedings.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST show-cause notice limitation requires timely portal service; internal generation and later upload cannot cure statutory invalidity.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 73's three-month minimum period for issuing a GST show-cause notice before the deadline for an order is mandatory and preserves a meaningful opportunity to respond. Extension of the outer time limit for the order does not extend the deadline for issuing notice unless the statute provides otherwise. A notice created only in an internal system, awaiting GSTN confirmation and lacking a CRN, is not issued or served where it is neither integrated with the common portal nor otherwise communicated to the taxpayer. Later portal upload cannot retrospectively cure limitation; scrutiny communications and hearing opportunities cannot replace a foundational notice.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Condonation of delay requires consideration of a taxpayer's explanation; failure to do so restores the GST appeal for merits.
Case-Laws
GST
Condonation of delay in GST appeals requires the appellate authority to consider the taxpayer's specific explanation rather than reject the appeal solely by referring to the statutory limitation provision. Failure to assess a plea that an accountant did not inform the taxpayer of the limitation period undermines the rejection, irrespective of whether that plea ultimately merits condonation. The delayed appeal was restored for decision on merits after condonation, subject to payment of costs within the stipulated period; failure to comply withdraws that benefit.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Consideration of delay-condonation grounds required before rejecting GST appeals on limitation; merits review follows upon compliance with conditions.
Case-Laws
GST
Failure to consider grounds advanced in a delay-condonation application rendered the rejection of a delayed GST appeal unsustainable, irrespective of whether those grounds would ultimately succeed. The High Court set aside the limitation-based rejection, condoned the delay subject to timely payment of costs, and required the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits. Protection would lapse upon non-compliance with that condition or unnecessary adjournments. The underlying tax demand was not examined.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pre-trial detention in GST fake-invoice prosecutions cannot continue after investigation absent risks to trial integrity.
Case-Laws
GST
Pre-conviction detention in GST prosecutions alleging fake entities and wrongful input tax credit is not punitive; bail serves to secure attendance at trial. Continued custody was considered unwarranted after completion of investigation and filing of the complaint where the Magistrate-triable offence carried a maximum five-year sentence and trial was unlikely to conclude within a reasonable time. The absence of criminal antecedents or material suggesting absconding, witness intimidation, evidence tampering, or subversion of justice supported release. Bail was granted subject to conditions ensuring trial participation and protecting evidence and witnesses.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pre-arrest reasons for arrest must be communicated, and later constitutional rulings generally apply to earlier arrests.
Case-Laws
GST
Pre-arrest communication of recorded reasons to believe is required where an authorised officer effects an arrest under section 26 of the Act. As section 26 is in pari materia with comparable arrest provisions, the reasons must be supplied to the arrestee before arrest, enabling anticipatory-bail remedies and judicial review; production before the Magistrate at remand is insufficient. Constitutional-court rulings generally declare existing law and apply retrospectively unless expressly confined to prospective operation. Arrest without communication of the reasons breaches the safeguards under Articles 21 and 22 and is liable to be quashed, with release subject to any other lawful custody.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit cannot be denied solely because a supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; eligibility requires evidence review.
Case-Laws
GST
Retrospective cancellation of a supplier's registration alone does not establish that supplies were fictitious or that the recipient was complicit, so input tax credit eligibility requires examination of invoices, e-way bills, transport records and other evidence against statutory conditions. The recipient bears the initial burden of proof, but the department cannot deny credit solely under section 155 or on the supplier's non-existence. Fraud-based demands require foundational facts and cogent material of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade tax. If those elements fail, section 75(2) permits treatment under section 73 only where the original notice met the applicable section 73 limitation; eligibility must then be determined after hearing and evidence review.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Transitional CENVAT credit permits full unavailed capital-goods credit, while TRAN-1 invoice omissions require verification of supporting records.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 140(2), read with its Explanation, permits transition of unavailed CENVAT credit on pre-GST capital goods where the credit was admissible under both the existing and GST laws and was not carried forward in the earlier return. No requirement exists that part of the credit must previously have been availed, and a nil prior claim does not restrict otherwise eligible credit to fifty per cent. Where TRAN-1 records one capital-goods invoice but includes an annexure covering multiple invoices, omitted invoice details may be produced for verification. Credit on those invoices depends on verification of their eligibility and supporting records.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Merchant-export concession requires direct movement; disclosed supplies face non-fraud GST demand while undisclosed supplies retain fraud-based liability.
Case-Laws
GST
Merchant-export concessional GST rate requires direct movement of goods from the supplier to the export port or registered warehouse; movement through third-party distilleries does not satisfy the condition, notwithstanding actual export. For supplies disclosed through departmental intimations, incorrect availment of the concession alone did not establish fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to evade tax, requiring redetermination as a non-fraud demand under Section 73(1). The fraud-based demand remained applicable to a supply for which no intimation was filed. Interest is compensatory and applies to tax ultimately determined as payable. Tax liability must be recomputed with cum-tax benefit under the CGST valuation rules.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 74 suppression demands require pleaded foundational facts, while undisclosed rental income supports extended-period GST liability.
Case-Laws
GST
GST jurisdiction over renting services follows the supplier's registered business location; the property location determines place of supply and inter-State character but does not displace jurisdiction, sustaining the rental-tax demand. Consolidated notices and adjudication for multiple financial years remain valid. Section 74 demands require pleaded foundational facts establishing fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression intended to evade tax; absent such facts for return-disclosed freight and credits, those demands and penalties were set aside for determination under Section 75(2) read with Section 73(1). Undeclared rental income constituted suppression, so its tax, interest and equal penalty were upheld. Section 74 does not govern late fee or interest. GSTR-2A non-reflection alone does not bar otherwise eligible ITC; invoice-supported credit claims required merits reconsideration.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Zero-rated export turnover includes invoices issued in the refund period even where goods are exported later.
Case-Laws
GST
Rule 89(4) determines zero-rated turnover for a relevant refund period by reference to invoices issued for goods cleared for export under bond or letter of undertaking. Goods covered by those invoices may be physically exported after that period, provided actual export is established. The value of invoices issued during the relevant period should not be excluded from accumulated input tax credit refund computation merely because the corresponding shipping bills bear later dates. Refund eligibility therefore depends on issuance of qualifying export invoices during the period and subsequent proof of export, rather than the date of the shipping bill alone.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Actual receipt of goods governs input tax credit, while duplicate penalties require statutory justification and procedural fairness.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit requires the claimant to establish actual receipt of goods. Invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, stock records and banking-channel payments do not prove receipt where suppliers are found bogus or non-existent and vehicle-related material indicates no physical movement of goods. Payment of tax cannot replace the statutory requirement of actual receipt, supporting denial of credit. Separate penalties for the same wrongful availment require recorded justification and must comply with the bar on multiple penalties for the same act or omission. Penalty enhancement also requires adherence to principles of natural justice; penalty determination must therefore be reconsidered under that statutory restriction.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Technical e-way bill discrepancies cannot support GST penalties where transactions are reported, tax paid, and evasion intent is absent.
Case-Laws
GST
Technical discrepancies between e-way bill dispatch locations and transporter goods receipts do not justify GST penalty where consignments carry valid e-invoices and e-way bills, transactions are recorded in statutory returns, and applicable tax has been paid. In the absence of substantive irregularity or intent to evade tax, the procedural mismatch was insufficient for penalty under section 129. The penalty orders were quashed, with consequential refund in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Prospective refund restrictions cannot defeat pre-existing input tax credit claims merely because the refund application was filed later.
Case-Laws
GST
Notification-based restrictions on refunds of unutilized input tax credit for edible oils under an inverted duty structure operate prospectively from 18 July 2022. They do not deny refunds for credit accumulated before that date merely because a fresh application was filed later. A circular cannot retrospectively curtail an accrued input tax credit entitlement without statutory basis. Where a claim concerns the pre-notification period and is filed within the limitation period, rejection based solely on the later filing date is unsustainable. Refund claims require fresh consideration under applicable law and judicial precedents, while interest remains for examination in the refund proceedings.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory GST appeal limits bar excess delay condonation, while restoring registration prevents departmental challenge to the implemented order.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 107(4) confines the First Appellate Authority's power to condone delay in GST registration-cancellation appeals to its prescribed outer limit; writ-jurisdiction orders based on particular facts, hardship, equity, or substantial justice cannot expand that statutory jurisdiction. Condonation beyond that limit is therefore without jurisdiction. Where the Department has implemented an appellate restoration of GST registration and the taxpayer has continued business on that basis, estoppel and orderly administration prevent the Department from later challenging the implemented order. As no effective relief remains and intervening genuine transactions would be unsettled, the departmental challenge is infructuous and not maintainable.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commencement of Finance Act amendments brings specified statutory changes into force from the appointed date
Notifications
GST
Sections 153 to 155 of the Finance Act, 2026 take effect on 1 November 2026. Their commencement activates the amendments enacted through these provisions, including amendments to sections 15, 34, 54 and 101A. The amendments accordingly apply from the appointed date, which establishes the operative commencement date for the specified Finance Act changes under central tax law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST registration processing requires prescribed documents, restricted officer queries, and time-bound approval, with simplified electronic registration for eligible small suppliers.
Circulars
GST
GST registration applicants must file the appropriate online form and furnish accurate, legible information on business constitution, promoters, authorised signatories, and principal or additional places of business, supported by prescribed premises documents. Aadhaar authentication generally enables processing within seven working days; non-authentication, risk selection, or authorised physical verification permits processing within thirty days. Eligible small suppliers may receive automated simplified registration within three working days, subject to restrictions on input tax credit passed to registered recipients. Officers may seek clarification only through FORM GST REG-03 for specified deficiencies, must avoid irrelevant or presumptive queries, and must decide replies within seven working days. Registration is deemed approved if no timely action occurs.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Omission of the GST export-refund restriction applies retrospectively to pending proceedings absent an express saving provision.
Circulars
GST
The omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules is to be given retrospective effect from 23 October 2017. The rule had restricted IGST refunds on exports where specified input exemptions or concessional benefits were availed, to prevent double benefits. In the absence of a saving or sunset clause, omission applies to proceedings pending when the rule was removed; the General Clauses Act does not preserve pending proceedings following omission of a rule. Pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) must therefore be dealt with on that basis. The same treatment applies to the omissions of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B).
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Export payment realisation through repatriable INR accounts, compliant set-offs, and net retention meets GST export conditions.
Circulars
GST
Receipt of consideration for exported services in convertible foreign exchange or through repatriable INR accounts, including SNRR, INR Nostro and NRE accounts, satisfies the IGST export-of-service payment condition, subject to applicable FEMA and RBI requirements. Payments through NRO accounts qualify only when routed through repatriable INR accounts. RBI-compliant set-off of service export receivables against service import payables, and reinsurance brokers' net retention of commission, also satisfy that condition. For exported goods, the FEMA-prescribed or extended period governs realisation of sale proceeds for GST refund purposes. Refund recovery for non-realisation does not apply where an AD Bank writes off the realisation requirement wholly or partly.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit on dealer-agency demo vehicles is available, aligning their treatment with traditional vehicle dealerships.
Circulars
GST
Input tax credit on demo vehicles used by authorised agents in the dealer-agency model is not blocked under the passenger motor vehicle restriction. The expression “such motor vehicles” permits credit not only for the particular vehicle ultimately supplied, but also for demo vehicles used to further supplies of similar vehicles. Although customer sales are made directly by the manufacturer in the dealer-agency model, the demo vehicles serve the same sales-promotion purpose as in the traditional dealership model. The earlier clarification denying credit to dealer-agency agents is withdrawn, ensuring equivalent ITC treatment for demo vehicles under both models.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Banking-sector ITC apportionment under section 17(4) requires a uniform credit election across all eligible registrations
Circulars
GST
Section 17(4) permits the fifty-percent eligible input tax credit method only for registrations of banking companies, financial institutions and NBFCs that supply deposit, loan or advance services; registrations not providing those services cannot elect or must not follow that method. Once an eligible registration elects it, all eligible registrations of that entity must comply. The second-proviso relaxation applies only to supplies received from same-PAN registrants that have also elected section 17(4). GSTR-3B reporting requires permanent reversal of non-business, blocked and the remaining ineligible credit, with temporary reversal and later reclaim of credit where section 16 conditions are subsequently met. Under IMS, presently ineligible invoices must be kept pending. Earlier reporting practices should not attract adverse action if the resulting credit conforms to these principles.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input Service Distributor credit rules assign eligibility, reversals and refund treatment to recipients while excluding transfer invoices from turnover.
Circulars
GST
Input Service Distributors must obtain registration where separately registered business verticals or places of business receive input-service invoices for distinct persons, and must distribute credit only to the attributable recipient. Recipients must satisfy input tax credit eligibility conditions and undertake required reversals; ISDs remain liable for penalties for improper distribution, while excess credit is recoverable from recipients. Credit must be distributed in the month the ISD prima facie determines it eligible, separately identifying eligible and ineligible credit in GSTR-6. The rule 54(1A) mechanism merely transfers credit: related invoices do not form turnover or Net ITC for refund purposes, and reversals rest with recipients rather than the transferring registrant.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST appellate pre-deposit rules clarify disputed tax calculation, refund entitlement, interest dates, and remand-related adjustment requirements.
Circulars
GST
CGST appeal pre-deposit requirements distinguish admitted liability, payable in full, from disputed tax, of which 10% must be deposited at each appellate stage. The Tribunal-stage deposit is calculated on the disputed liability confirmed by the Appellate Authority. Refund of pre-deposit following a favourable appellate order does not require an express refund direction and must be claimed through FORM GST RFD-01 under “on account of order”. A departmental further appeal does not bar refund unless the favourable order is stayed. Interest on refunds is computed separately from each actual pre-deposit payment date. On remand, pre-deposit is refundable; for partial remand, confirmed demand and applicable interest must first be recovered or adjusted.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reasoned GST adjudication requires evidence-based notices, fair hearings, fraud-specific proof, and appellate scrutiny within statutory limits.
Circulars
GST
CGST demand, adjudication and first-appeal guidelines require show cause notices to state material facts, legal grounds, evidence, issue-wise quantification, and electronic summaries in prescribed forms. Demands based on fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression require disclosed evidence of deliberate intent to evade tax; absent this, demand must be confined to the non-fraud route. Authorities must avoid parallel CGST and SGST/UTGST proceedings on the same subject, afford effective hearings, and issue reasoned orders limited to SCN grounds and amounts. Rectification is confined to patent record errors by the issuing authority, not merits review. Appeals require threshold scrutiny, separately reasoned limitation findings, controlled admission of new grounds or evidence, and timely reasoned disposal.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST notice service requires alternative delivery and personal hearing before ex parte assessment; time-barred input tax credit is quashed.
Case-Laws
GST
Effective service of GST notices requires more than portal upload where repeated non-response indicates that the taxpayer may not have received notice. In those circumstances, the officer must consider other permitted service modes, preferably RPAD, and provide a clear personal-hearing notice; otherwise, an ex parte assessment becomes an empty formality. The assessment on issues other than input tax credit limitation was set aside for fresh consideration after reply and hearing, subject to stipulated partial tax payment. The input tax credit component disallowed as time-barred under section 16(4) was separately quashed in accordance with an earlier common order.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =