Goods and Services Tax

Andhra govt exempts Rs 20 crore stamp duty, registration fees for BPCL refinery, petro complex
GST
Dated:- 10-2-2026
PTI
Amaravati, Feb 10 (PTI) The Andhra Pradesh government has exempted stamp duty and registration fees amounting to over Rs 20 crore in favour of BPCL to facilitate the setting up of a greenfield refinery and petrochemical complex near Ramayapatnam Port in Nellore district.
G Sai Prasad, special chief secretary (FAC), Revenue (Registration. II) Department said the exemption pertains to the transfer of over 600 acres of land in Chevuru village, Gudluru mandal of Nellore district from Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board (APMB) to Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) and in turn from APIIC to BPCL

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s flow from the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Development Policy 4.0, launched on October 16, 2024.
In May 2025, the government accorded permission to APMB chief executive to transfer 6,000 acres of land from the maritime board to APIIC to complete the process of allocation of lands to Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd's (BPCL) project, exempting stamp duty and registration fees.
Though the Inspector General of Registration and Stamps had stated that the total value of the land stretching up to an extent of 600.4 acres as per market value basic register is over Rs 17.9 crore, the APIIC appraised it at over Rs 136 crore at the rate of Rs 22.6 lakh per acre.
Further, the Inspector General of Registration and Stamps stated that Nellore district

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Power to summon under Section 70 of CGST Act affirmed; summons not detention and compensation claim dismissed.
Case-Laws
GST
Power to summon under Section 70 of the CGST Act permits issuance of summons for inquiry and such attendance does not by itself constitute arrest or illegal detention; therefore no seven day prior notice is mandated by Section 70 and Order XVI C.P.C. requirement was held inapplicable. The petitioner attended and acknowledged multiple summonses without objection, was allowed mobile access and voluntary presence at GST Bhavan, and only upon ascertainment of involvement was arrested and produced before a Magistrate. The claim for compensation for alleged illegal detention was rejected and the petition dismissed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service by uploading on GST portal and condonation of delay – Appellate Authority to reconsider and hear the appeal if delay excused
Case-Laws
GST
High Court considered condonation of delay where an adjudication order was allegedly served only by uploading on the GST portal; limitation does not commence if service was not properly effected. The HC observed the grounds for condonation were not previously presented to the Appellate Authority but granted the petitioner an opportunity to reapply within three weeks with supporting explanations and documents. The Appellate Authority must reconsider the condonation application in light of the Division Bench precedent in M/s Ram Kumar Sinhal and related judgments; if satisfied the delay is excusable or service was ineffective, it shall hear the appeal and the impugned appellate order will be set aside.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Masala Paan classification as mixed supply and taxable as miscellaneous edible preparation; taxed at 18%.
Case-Laws
GST
Masala paan comprises multiple equally necessary ingredients, so it does not qualify as a composite supply with betel leaf as the principal supply; therefore it is a mixed supply with no single principal component. Applying mixed supply analysis and tariff interpretation, the product lacks a specific entry in Chapter 21 and falls to the residual classification as a miscellaneous edible preparation. The consequence is classification under HSN heading for miscellaneous edible preparations and taxation at 18% under the applicable GST schedule entry.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Composite supply of hospital inpatient services treated as health care principal supply; room rent above Rs.5000/day remains taxable.
Case-Laws
GST
Tax treatment of bundled hospital charges was assessed: supplies to in patients (room, tests, medicines, consumables and care) constitute a composite supply with healthcare services as the principal supply under Section 2(30). Consequently the composite transaction is classifiable as inpatient health care and falls within the exemption scope of SI. No.74 read with section 8(a), but the proviso excludes exemption for room charges (other than ICU/CCU) when room rent exceeds Rs. 5,000 per day; such excess room rent is taxable even though other components remain exempt.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supply of canteen services to employees as business activity; recoveries are taxable while unrecovered perquisites are exempt
Case-Laws
GST
Supply of canteen services to employees falls within “in the course or furtherance of business” and therefore qualifies as supply under section 7(1), because incidental or ancillary activities connected to main business are covered; outcome: the activity is taxable as supply. Provision of canteen by a third party provider to the employer is a supplier-recipient transaction and the employer's recoveries from employees constitute consideration; outcome: amounts recovered from employees are subject to GST. Free or concessional canteen benefits constitute perquisites; outcome: only the concession portion is exempt as perquisite (non taxable), and unrecovered value is not taxable.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Remand for fresh hearing after appellate authority failed to consider documentary evidence; appeal quashed and remanded.
Case-Laws
GST
Appellate authority failed to consider documentary evidence already placed before the adjudicating authority; accordingly the appellate order is quashed and the matter remanded for fresh hearing requiring consideration of those documents. The petitioner did not appear at the scheduled personal hearings despite service of notices, and the court found absence of fault in the appellate authority's decision to proceed given nonappearance; however the appellate authority was nevertheless obliged to examine the documentary record when adjudicating the appeal, and its failure to do so determined the remand outcome.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Retrospective registration cancellation challenged for lack of reasons and prior notice, review petition dismissed as not maintainable
Case-Laws
GST
Retrospective cancellation of registration was found invalid because the Show Cause Notice lacked reasons supporting retrospective action and the petitioner was not placed on prior notice; that defect rendered the impugned order void. The review petition sought to reopen arguments already concluded in adjudication, but review jurisdiction cannot serve as an original hearing; therefore reopening overruled contentions was impermissible. The court found no manifest or material error on the face of the record amounting to a miscarriage of justice and accordingly dismissed the review petition.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Condonation of delay in GST appeal under extended one month period leads to remand for adjudication on merits.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 107(4) of the Act allows the Appellate Authority to condone delay by permitting an appeal to be filed within an additional one month period if the appellant shows sufficient cause for missing the primary three or six month window; therefore a 15 day delay justified by non fanciful grounds cannot be defeated by a hyper technical threshold dismissal. The High Court found the respondents' insistence on an earlier cutoff date legally unsustainable, set aside the earlier order, condoned the delay, and remitted the matter to the appellate authority for adjudication on merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defect.
Case-Laws
GST
Proceedings and a determination under the tax recovery provision were initiated and concluded against a sole proprietor who had died before the show cause notice; the court found the proceedings defective because no notice was directed to the legal representative after death, rendering initiation and the resulting order invalid. The appellate authority rejected the subsequent appeal on limitation without addressing this jurisdictional defect; because the procedural flaw went undecided by the appellate body, the impugned order could not be sustained and the writ challenging the determination was disposed of in favour of the petitioner.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment application.
Case-Laws
GST
Revocation of cancelled GST registration was directed to be pursued by petitioners so they can file blocked GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns; outcome: court granted liberty to apply for revocation and for permission to file returns. Petitioners may apply for payment of outstanding tax by instalments under the statutory scheme; outcome: bank accounts will be defrozen on filing such application and providing sufficient security. Security must satisfy the regional GST rule on security for tax recovery. Administrative outcome: petitioners given one week to file applications and authorities two weeks to dispose of them.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input Tax Credit denial tied to supplier non filing of GSTR 3B; appellate order set aside for exceeding notice grounds and remanded for fresh hearing
Case-Laws
GST
Denial of input tax credit was grounded solely on the supplier's non-filing of Form GSTR-3B; when the supplier subsequently filed returns for the disputed months the original demands were rightly dropped for those months but remained for the month still unfiled. The appellate authority relied on additional grounds not pleaded in the notice to show cause, contrary to the principle that adjudication must remain within the confines of the notice. Because adjudication on extraneous grounds breaches the obligation to afford a hearing on those grounds, the appellate order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision after affording an opportunity to be heard.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of materials.
Case-Laws
GST
Right to access seized documents and electronic evidence requires that the adjudicating authority provide the affected party a meaningful opportunity to participate; absence of returned seized material prevented effective defence and appeal. The impugned adjudication is treated as an additional show cause notice, and the authority must hand over seized documents or copies and the seized CPU, allow a two week composite reply period from receipt, and conclude proceedings after affording an opportunity of hearing. The court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication and left all merits open to the adjudicating authority.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Limitation and rectification under UPGST Act: appeals held maintainable despite delay where rectification was sought and deposits made.
Case-Laws
GST
Abeyance of limitation applies where a rectification application under the GST statute was pending; the time spent pursuing rectification is excluded and the appeal is maintainable despite delay, the Court applying the principle of bona fide pursuit before a wrong forum and directing the appellate authority to decide on merits. Because the petitioner deposited 10% in the leading matter and 25% in the connected matter, the appeals are to be treated as not barred by delay, and the appellate authority must decide them on merits within two months. Writ petitions disposed accordingly.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Presumption of constitutionality for subordinate legislation and board directions under CGST act; challenged circular upheld, summons rescheduled.
Case-Laws
GST
A High Court reaffirmed the presumption of constitutionality for subordinate legislation and held that the central board may issue orders, instructions, or directions to Central Tax Officers to secure uniform implementation; those officers and implementation staff must follow them. The court accepted that assignment of functions to Central Tax Officers may be proposed by the Commissioner in the Board and approved by the Board, and therefore found no basis to invalidate the challenged administrative circular dated 5 July 2017. The writ petition was partly allowed only to reschedule compliance with a summons to a new date, and the challenge to the circular was dismissed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service by uploading on GST portal may be insufficient; officer must use alternative modes, remand allowed subject to deposit.
Case-Laws
GST
When a tax notice was uploaded only on the GST portal and the recipient did not receive the original, the uploading was held insufficient to afford an effective personal hearing; the issuing officer must explore alternative modes of service (including registered post with acknowledgment) before proceeding ex parte. The impugned assessment was set aside for lack of opportunity of hearing and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, subject to the condition that the taxpayer deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks; the setting aside takes effect from the date of that payment.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification and assessment dispute: conditional bank attachment vacated after 25% deposit; appeal may be decided on merits.
Case-Laws
GST
Rectification proceedings and assessment dispute concerning a tax demand were addressed by conditioning interim relief on a partial deposit: the taxpayer must deposit 25% of the disputed tax and have no other outstanding tax arrears for the bank attachment to be vacated. The appellate authority is permitted to decide the statutory appeal on merits even if limitation issues exist, provided the appeal is filed within the prescribed period. Failure to comply with the stipulated conditions permits the tax authority to resume recovery as if the petition were dismissed. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST registration amendment after corporate insolvency management change – tribunal-approved management requires reconsideration and restoration opportunity.
Case-Laws
GST
High Court reviewed refusal to amend and cancellation of GST registration after a corporate insolvency resolution process placed new management. The court found the tax authority had proceeded on the incorrect premise that the old management remained in control despite the tribunal-approved change, quashed the impugned orders dated 13.11.2025 and 14.11.2025, and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's amendment application dated 03.11.2025. The authority must re-evaluate the registration amendment and objections and pass fresh orders within three weeks, restoring the petitioner's opportunity to operate under the new management.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Profiteering over input tax credit and price reduction sent for re-investigation while limitation objections are examined
Case-Laws
GST
Allegations concern whether a supplier passed the benefit of input tax credit to purchasers by reducing prices; this requires verification of documentary evidence and calculation of the claimed Rs.173 per buyer and alleged Rs.32.78 per sq ft profiteering. Limitation objections under sections governing recovery of tax were raised by the respondent and must be examined against the investigative record. The Appellate Tribunal directed re investigation by the DGAP under the procedural rule for further factual and accounting scrutiny to determine if a commensurate price reduction was effected and whether statutory time limit defenses bar recovery.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representative.
Case-Laws
GST
Reassessment initiated after the assessee's death is a jurisdictional defect when proceedings continue against a deceased person; the assessment and consequential notices in such circumstances must be set aside and reassessment may be re-initiated only after complying with statutory formalities. Where the Revenue lacked knowledge of death at the time notice was issued, discovery of death requires corrective procedural steps. If a written request to identify legal representatives and heirs is ignored for seven days, the Revenue may treat the petitioner as the deceased's legal representative and proceed against that petitioner, with such proceedings not being vulnerable for nonimpleading other heirs.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification under GST Act: procedural failure to verify portal ITC reconciliation and denial of hearing led to remand for fresh disposal and hearing
Case-Laws
GST
Rectification of GST records was challenged on grounds that an application seeking correction and reconciliation of input tax credit (ITC) was rejected without affording an opportunity of hearing and without verifying uploaded portal records. The court found the rejection procedurally defective for not recording reasons for disregarding submitted reconciliation statements and supporting documents, and for failing to provide a personal hearing; therefore the rejection order was set aside. The matter is remanded for fresh disposal of the rectification application, with directions to consider portal evidence, allow the applicant to present documents and explanations, and hear the applicant within a specified short period.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST reverse charge and import of services bail granted where offences are triable by Magistrate and detention prolonged
Case-Laws
GST
Regular bail was granted in GST criminal proceedings concerning import of services and IGST under reverse charge because the offences are triable by a Magistrate, attract limited punishment, and allegations rest on documentary evidence; consequence: petitioners released on bail. The court held absence of fraud in the arrest memo and prolonged detention (about six months) weighed in favour of liberty; consequence: bail extended despite ongoing investigation. The court noted that further investigation or filing of a supplementary complaint is not a bar to bail without specific justification; consequence: continued probe did not defeat bail. The requirement to complete assessment before prosecution is generally required but admits narrow exceptions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST registration cancellation quashed – restoration granted subject to discharge of pending tax liability under Tvl.Suguna precedent.
Case-Laws
GST
Quashing of GST registration cancellation was ordered and the registration directed to be restored, subject to the petitioner discharging outstanding tax arrears as a condition precedent under the Tvl. Suguna authority; the court relied on that precedent to require payment and reporting of tax liability before restoration. The impugned cancellation in Form GST REG-13 was set aside, and restoration was conditioned on compliance with the directions in the cited precedent. Allegations of suppression of material fact were noted in the proceeding.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST liability on mandated contributions to DMF and NMET under MMDR Act: DMF exempted; NMET held taxable.
Case-Laws
GST
Questions not raised before the lower authority were not entertained. The authority found that statutory payments mandated by the MMDR Act (30% of royalty to DMF; 2% to NMET) arise from mining activity and form part of royalty paid in the course or furtherance of business. Applying CBEC clarification, contributions to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) are not subject to GST, and the appeal on DMF is allowed (no refunds). Contributions to the National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) are not exempted by that clarification and remain taxable; the lower ruling on NMET is upheld.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bharat Law House Pvt. Ltd. Launches Three Power-Packed Books, Authored by Adv. Suresh Sharma and Adv. Varun Sharma
GST
Dated:- 5-2-2026
PTI
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], February 05: A significant literary and professional milestone was marked on January 31, 2026, with the grand launch of three books published by Bharat Law House Pvt. Ltd., including two landmark GST titles and The First-Generation Lawyer. The event, held in Fortune Select Exotica – Member ITC HotelsÂ’ Group, Navi Mumbai from 5:30 PM to 8:30 PM, brought together an eminent gathering of dignitaries, legal professionals, chartered accountants, and business leaders to celebrate definitive new contributions to GST law and practice. The event was hosted by Mr. Ravi Pu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ney-Laundering Act, 2002) – Law & Practice The event also featured the Authors: • Advocate Suresh Sharma – Practitioner in Tax Litigation • Advocate Varun Sharma – Practitioner in Tax Litigation The Chief Guest and Honorary Guests shared their perspectives on the evolving GST framework, enforcement challenges, and the importance of practical legal understanding for professionals and businesses.
The evening marked the launch of three significant legal publications by Bharat Law House Pvt. Ltd., united by one shared professional journey, the evolution of legal practice from courtroom expertise to lived experience.
The two GST-focused titles, authored by Adv. Suresh Sharma and Adv. Varun Sharma, offers definitive, practice-oriented insight

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =