Anticipatory bail after charges are framed may continue where completed investigation eliminates any need for custodial interrogation.

Anticipatory bail after charges are framed may continue where completed investigation eliminates any need for custodial interrogation.Case-LawsGSTCompletion of investigation, filing of the charge-sheet, framing of charges and commencement of trial remo…

Anticipatory bail after charges are framed may continue where completed investigation eliminates any need for custodial interrogation.
Case-Laws
GST
Completion of investigation, filing of the charge-sheet, framing of charges and commencement of trial remove the need for custodial interrogation, supporting grant of anticipatory bail. Bail may be granted subject to conditions set by the Investigating Officer, continued cooperation with the investigation and furnishing bail bonds before the jurisdictional court. On these grounds, the refusal of anticipatory bail was set aside and anticipatory bail was granted.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Post-charge-sheet bail may follow where investigation is complete and further custodial interrogation is unnecessary.

Post-charge-sheet bail may follow where investigation is complete and further custodial interrogation is unnecessary.Case-LawsGSTBail may be granted after filing of a charge-sheet where no further custodial interrogation is required. In allegations con…

Post-charge-sheet bail may follow where investigation is complete and further custodial interrogation is unnecessary.
Case-Laws
GST
Bail may be granted after filing of a charge-sheet where no further custodial interrogation is required. In allegations concerning unrecorded dry-fruit transactions and issuance of tax invoices, release on bail was directed subject to conditions imposed by the jurisdictional court. The accused was also required to appear before that court within two weeks. The material highlights completion of investigation and absence of a continuing custodial need as relevant considerations for post-charge-sheet bail.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory appellate remedy for GST registration cancellation requires factual disputes to be pursued before the appellate authority.

Statutory appellate remedy for GST registration cancellation requires factual disputes to be pursued before the appellate authority.Case-LawsGSTAvailability of a statutory appellate remedy against GST registration cancellation and rejection of revocati…

Statutory appellate remedy for GST registration cancellation requires factual disputes to be pursued before the appellate authority.
Case-Laws
GST
Availability of a statutory appellate remedy against GST registration cancellation and rejection of revocation ordinarily precludes adjudication of factual disputes in writ jurisdiction. Appeals lay against both orders; therefore, factual contentions remained open for determination by the appellate authority. Where the revocation-rejection order was undated but served on 22 August 2026, the service date was directed to be treated as the order date for pursuing the appellate remedy. The taxpayer was permitted to file appeals against both orders within two weeks, for expeditious disposal.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation and verified credit.

Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation and verified credit.Case-LawsGSTAccumulated input tax credit refunds under an inverted duty structure…

Inverted-duty-structure refunds remain available for unchanged-rate apparel supplies despite trader status and require tax-period-specific computation and verified credit.
Case-Laws
GST
Accumulated input tax credit refunds under an inverted duty structure depend on the tax rates applicable to supplies, not on whether the registered person is a manufacturer or trader. A circular addressing accumulation caused by a GST rate reduction on the same goods does not exclude refunds for finished apparel supplied at an unchanged rate; higher-taxed inputs may remain eligible under the prescribed formula. Refunds must be computed tax-period-wise, and period-specific calculation satisfies that requirement. Verification must address ineligible credit, invoice reconciliation and credit relating to zero-rated supplies; unsupported objections do not displace findings based on examined records. The refund claims were sustained and the Revenue appeals dismissed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Parbhani civic staffers suspend strike after agreement on pending salaries of two months

Parbhani civic staffers suspend strike after agreement on pending salaries of two monthsGSTDated:- 11-9-2026PTIParbhani, Sep 11 (PTI) Employees of Parbhani City Municipal Corporation on Friday temporarily suspended their strike after the civic administ…

Parbhani civic staffers suspend strike after agreement on pending salaries of two months
GST
Dated:- 11-9-2026
PTI
Parbhani, Sep 11 (PTI) Employees of Parbhani City Municipal Corporation on Friday temporarily suspended their strike after the civic administration assured them that pending salaries of two months would be paid by September 15.

The employees had launched the stir demanding payment of pending salaries, an increase in GST grants to the civic body and release of the outs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Jurisdiction mapping transition requires existing officers to retain pre-assigned GST functions until Boweb Portal roles are updated.

Jurisdiction mapping transition requires existing officers to retain pre-assigned GST functions until Boweb Portal roles are updated.CircularsGST – StatesExisting officers must continue handling all registration, refund, scrutiny, audit, enforcement, a…

Jurisdiction mapping transition requires existing officers to retain pre-assigned GST functions until Boweb Portal roles are updated.
Circulars
GST – States
Existing officers must continue handling all registration, refund, scrutiny, audit, enforcement, adjudication, appeal and related tasks allocated to them before the jurisdictional order of 17 August 2026. This temporary direction applies despite changes to an officer's office nomenclature or territorial jurisdiction, until the Boweb Portal is updated to reflect amended jurisdiction mappings. It is issued to ensure uniform implementation of the Rajasthan GST framework and remove administrative ambiguity arising from the creation of new offices and reassignment of jurisdictions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Territorial jurisdiction of GST proper officers aligns with corresponding VAT officer assignments, replacing the previous jurisdictional framework.

Territorial jurisdiction of GST proper officers aligns with corresponding VAT officer assignments, replacing the previous jurisdictional framework.CircularsGST – StatesTerritorial jurisdiction under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is ass…

Territorial jurisdiction of GST proper officers aligns with corresponding VAT officer assignments, replacing the previous jurisdictional framework.
Circulars
GST – States
Territorial jurisdiction under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is assigned to corresponding levels of proper officers, aligning GST jurisdiction with territorial assignments made under the Rajasthan VAT Rules, 2025 and specified provisions of the Rajasthan VAT Act, 2003. The order supersedes the earlier territorial-jurisdiction notification issued in 2023 and takes effect from 15 August 2026.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST jurisdiction after taxpayer migration preserves valid prior actions while transferring all subsequent proceedings to the current officer.

GST jurisdiction after taxpayer migration preserves valid prior actions while transferring all subsequent proceedings to the current officer.CircularsGST – StatesJurisdiction under the RGST Act is determined on the date a statutory power is exercised. …

GST jurisdiction after taxpayer migration preserves valid prior actions while transferring all subsequent proceedings to the current officer.
Circulars
GST – States
Jurisdiction under the RGST Act is determined on the date a statutory power is exercised. Actions validly undertaken by the officer having jurisdiction before a taxable person migrates to another jurisdiction remain valid and are not retrospectively invalidated. After migration, the former jurisdictional officer cannot initiate or continue action and must refer any new matter to the current jurisdictional officer. The current officer must take over pending proceedings from their existing stage, implement earlier actions, pursue consequential proceedings, and represent or conduct related appellate proceedings as though the earlier action had been initiated by that officer.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Personal hearing in GST adjudication remains mandatory; orders issued without it may be quashed and reconsidered after hearing.

Personal hearing in GST adjudication remains mandatory; orders issued without it may be quashed and reconsidered after hearing.Case-LawsGSTPersonal hearing before an adverse GST order is required to satisfy principles of natural justice. Where the Stat…

Personal hearing in GST adjudication remains mandatory; orders issued without it may be quashed and reconsidered after hearing.
Case-Laws
GST
Personal hearing before an adverse GST order is required to satisfy principles of natural justice. Where the State cannot establish that an opportunity of hearing was granted, a challenge based on procedural unfairness is sustainable. An adverse GST order issued without such hearing is liable to be quashed, while the Department may pass a fresh order only after providing a proper opportunity of hearing.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification timelines are directory, preserving authority’s power to decide timely applications on merits after three months.

Rectification timelines are directory, preserving authority’s power to decide timely applications on merits after three months.Case-LawsGSTA timely filed rectification application remains capable of decision on merits after the three-month disposal tim…

Rectification timelines are directory, preserving authority's power to decide timely applications on merits after three months.
Case-Laws
GST
A timely filed rectification application remains capable of decision on merits after the three-month disposal timeline expires. The requirement that the competent authority decide the application “as far as possible” within that period is directory: it requires an endeavour to comply but neither makes the authority functus officio nor removes its jurisdiction after three months. Rejection solely on the ground that the disposal period had expired was quashed, and the application was remitted for a merits-based decision within three months.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST portal restoration depends on a reasoned hearing and verification of bona fide registered proprietor status before GSTR-1 access.

GST portal restoration depends on a reasoned hearing and verification of bona fide registered proprietor status before GSTR-1 access.Case-LawsGSTRestoration of blocked GST portal access for furnishing Form GSTR-1 requires effective consideration of the…

GST portal restoration depends on a reasoned hearing and verification of bona fide registered proprietor status before GSTR-1 access.
Case-Laws
GST
Restoration of blocked GST portal access for furnishing Form GSTR-1 requires effective consideration of the taxpayer's supporting material. The taxpayer must submit a comprehensive representation in response to the information notice, and the competent authority must decide it through a reasoned and speaking order after granting a personal hearing. Where the material establishes that the taxpayer is a bona fide registered proprietor, the GST portal must be activated within 48 hours to enable Form GSTR-1 filing. The merits of the restoration request remain subject to fresh independent determination by the competent authority.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Anticipatory bail requires extraordinary circumstances and was refused where custodial interrogation was necessary in alleged forgery investigation.

Anticipatory bail requires extraordinary circumstances and was refused where custodial interrogation was necessary in alleged forgery investigation.Case-LawsGSTAnticipatory bail was refused where allegations of cheating and forgery involved inducing pu…

Anticipatory bail requires extraordinary circumstances and was refused where custodial interrogation was necessary in alleged forgery investigation.
Case-Laws
GST
Anticipatory bail was refused where allegations of cheating and forgery involved inducing purchases through fictitious firms and using forged invoices to evade deposit of collected tax. The accusations prima facie indicated the accused's involvement, while the investigation remained at an early stage. Custodial interrogation was considered necessary to establish the manner of the alleged offences and obtain material linking the accused to the fictitious firm. As pre-arrest bail requires extraordinary and exceptional circumstances, and none were established, the petition was dismissed without addressing the trial merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Proof of service for statutory summons is essential before alleging deliberate non-compliance or evasion during investigation.

Proof of service for statutory summons is essential before alleging deliberate non-compliance or evasion during investigation.Case-LawsGSTProof of service and acknowledgment of statutory summons are necessary to support an allegation of deliberate or w…

Proof of service for statutory summons is essential before alleging deliberate non-compliance or evasion during investigation.
Case-Laws
GST
Proof of service and acknowledgment of statutory summons are necessary to support an allegation of deliberate or wilful non-compliance during an investigation. Mere issuance of summons, without material establishing that the person concerned received and acknowledged them, does not establish intentional disobedience or evasion of appearance. On those facts, declining cognizance of the complaint was treated as free from jurisdictional error. Fresh summons may be issued where legally permissible, provided they are duly served and proof of service is maintained. No conclusion follows on the merits of the investigation or on any underlying liability or offence.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on actionable claims: retrospective valuation rules govern pending online gaming, betting and casino proceedings.

GST on actionable claims: retrospective valuation rules govern pending online gaming, betting and casino proceedings.Case-LawsGSTGST on actionable claims arising from betting and gambling, including online gaming and fantasy sports played with stakes, …

GST on actionable claims: retrospective valuation rules govern pending online gaming, betting and casino proceedings.
Case-Laws
GST
GST on actionable claims arising from betting and gambling, including online gaming and fantasy sports played with stakes, remains payable under the GST framework. The Supreme Court sustained the levy and the validity of the relevant provisions, Rule 31A, Rules 31B and 31C; the 2023 amendments and Rules 31B and 31C operate clarificatorily and retrospectively. Pending show-cause proceedings must be decided on that basis, with casino valuation recomputed under Rule 31C. Following an undertaking to adjudicate accordingly, the petitioner withdrew the petition without pressing reliefs.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Personal hearing and statutory payment window: GST adjudication cannot proceed without hearing or before the payment period expires.

Personal hearing and statutory payment window: GST adjudication cannot proceed without hearing or before the payment period expires.Case-LawsGSTGST adjudication involving penalty or other adverse liability requires an opportunity of personal hearing. A…

Personal hearing and statutory payment window: GST adjudication cannot proceed without hearing or before the payment period expires.
Case-Laws
GST
GST adjudication involving penalty or other adverse liability requires an opportunity of personal hearing. A show-cause notice stating that personal hearing is inapplicable, followed by an adjudication order without a hearing, breaches the statutory hearing requirement and principles of natural justice; a hearing in an unrelated earlier matter does not cure that defect. Section 74A(8)(ii) allows payment of tax and applicable interest within 60 days of the show-cause notice without penalty, with proceedings deemed concluded. Adjudication before expiry of that payment period contravenes the provision. Orders issued in breach of either requirement are unsustainable.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service-taxability of farm-product trading turnover requires examination before liability can be sustained on an unresponded adjudication.

Service-taxability of farm-product trading turnover requires examination before liability can be sustained on an unresponded adjudication.Case-LawsGSTService-tax liability on turnover from trading in farm products requires examination of whether that t…

Service-taxability of farm-product trading turnover requires examination before liability can be sustained on an unresponded adjudication.
Case-Laws
GST
Service-tax liability on turnover from trading in farm products requires examination of whether that turnover is exigible to service tax before liability can be sustained. Where the adjudicating order proceeded on the basis that no response was filed and no personal hearing was attended, reconsideration is required after allowing the taxpayer to respond and submit relevant material. The service-tax order was quashed and the proceedings restored for fresh consideration, with the taxpayer's response to be considered without rejection solely for delay. The writ petition was partly allowed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Physical verification before GST registration cancellation is required where fake-enterprise allegations rest solely on an official list.

Physical verification before GST registration cancellation is required where fake-enterprise allegations rest solely on an official list.Case-LawsGSTCancellation of GST registration based solely on a list identifying an enterprise as fake requires prio…

Physical verification before GST registration cancellation is required where fake-enterprise allegations rest solely on an official list.
Case-Laws
GST
Cancellation of GST registration based solely on a list identifying an enterprise as fake requires prior physical verification of its registered business premises, particularly where the registrant has responded to the show-cause notice with documents relating to State Authority proceedings. Treating the enterprise as non-operational without that verification was improper. The show-cause notice and cancellation order were quashed, while preserving the proper officer's ability to verify the premises under the GST Rules and take further action in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Effective hearing in GST adjudication requires actual opportunity to respond; ineffective service through a former auditor invalidated ex parte proceedings.

Effective hearing in GST adjudication requires actual opportunity to respond; ineffective service through a former auditor invalidated ex parte proceedings.Case-LawsGSTEffective opportunity of hearing in GST adjudication was denied where electronic not…

Effective hearing in GST adjudication requires actual opportunity to respond; ineffective service through a former auditor invalidated ex parte proceedings.
Case-Laws
GST
Effective opportunity of hearing in GST adjudication was denied where electronic notices were sent to e-mail credentials registered with an erstwhile auditor, leaving the taxpayer without effective knowledge of the proceedings. The High Court treated the explanation of loss of contact with the auditor as plausible and bona fide, and found that the resulting inability to respond justified intervention against the ex parte adjudication. The adjudication order and summary were quashed, with fresh consideration directed after a 10% deposit of the tax demand and filing of a response and supporting documents. The authority must issue a reasoned order after affording an opportunity to respond.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reasoned GST appellate orders are required before re-credit or liability recomputation, requiring fresh examination on remand.

Reasoned GST appellate orders are required before re-credit or liability recomputation, requiring fresh examination on remand.Case-LawsGSTRe-credit of excess tax to an electronic credit ledger requires examination of the taxpayer’s entitlement under th…

Reasoned GST appellate orders are required before re-credit or liability recomputation, requiring fresh examination on remand.
Case-Laws
GST
Re-credit of excess tax to an electronic credit ledger requires examination of the taxpayer's entitlement under the applicable refund framework and CBIC circulars. Relief cannot be granted without recorded reasons; the direction permitting re-credit was therefore set aside and remanded for a fresh speaking order. Recomputation of GST liability also requires a disclosed and reasoned basis, with reference to self-assessed and auto-generated returns and audit reports on record. The unexplained reduction of assessed liability was set aside and remanded for fresh determination after hearing both sides.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E-way bill vehicle mismatch supports tax-evasion inference and sustains penalties where Part B lacks timely correction.

E-way bill vehicle mismatch supports tax-evasion inference and sustains penalties where Part B lacks timely correction.Case-LawsGSTValid e-way bill compliance requires Part B to identify the vehicle actually transporting goods. Where a vehicle breaks d…

E-way bill vehicle mismatch supports tax-evasion inference and sustains penalties where Part B lacks timely correction.
Case-Laws
GST
Valid e-way bill compliance requires Part B to identify the vehicle actually transporting goods. Where a vehicle breaks down and goods are transferred, the movement must be supported by contemporaneous evidence and the e-way bill must be updated or freshly generated before transit. A later e-way bill issued by the purchaser does not cure a vehicle mismatch where the driver holds the supplier's invoice and no contemporaneous material establishes purchaser-led transport. Such discrepancies are not merely technical and can support an inference of intent to evade tax. Penalty proceedings under Section 129 for transport without a valid e-way bill were confirmed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Top Delhi High Court stories on Thursday

Top Delhi High Court stories on ThursdayGSTDated:- 10-9-2026PTINew Delhi, Sep 10 (PTI) Following are the top Delhi High Court stories on Thursday: LGD15 DL-HC-BHATIA-DEFAMATION (1:46 PM)

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked the Cockr…

Top Delhi High Court stories on Thursday
GST
Dated:- 10-9-2026
PTI
New Delhi, Sep 10 (PTI) Following are the top Delhi High Court stories on Thursday: LGD15 DL-HC-BHATIA-DEFAMATION (1:46 PM)

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) co-convenors Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka to take down certain allegedly objectionable posts against BJP national spokesperson and senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia.

LGD20 DL-HC-SALMAN-FILM (3:18 PM)

New Delhi: The makers of “Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legal”, purportedly based on actor Salman Khan, on Thursday told the Delhi High Court that the movie is not ready for release as it is yet to get the censor board's certification.

LGD33 DL-HC-G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

India in Full Flow — The Decade of Demand

India in Full Flow — The Decade of DemandGSTDated:- 10-9-2026PTIAILBIEA’s Silver Jubilee Knowledge Conference brings the GST Appellate Tribunal, senior Customs leadership, global suppliers and Capt. Raghu Raman to Mumbai on 11 September 2026 — headline…

India in Full Flow — The Decade of Demand
GST
Dated:- 10-9-2026
PTI
AILBIEA's Silver Jubilee Knowledge Conference brings the GST Appellate Tribunal, senior Customs leadership, global suppliers and Capt. Raghu Raman to Mumbai on 11 September 2026 — headlined by a live, open-floor deliberation on EMI – AEO whose Outcome Document goes to CBIC
Mumbai, India: The All India Liquid Bulk Importers & Exporters Association (AILBIEA), the apex national body for India's liquid bulk trade, will host its Silver Jubilee Knowledge Conference on Friday, 11 September 2026, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., at The Regal Ballroom, Hotel Trident, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 21. Themed “India in Full Flow — The Decade of Demand”, the conference precedes the Silver Jubilee Evening, which commences at the muhurat of 6:21 p.m. in the same venue.

A working agenda, not a ceremonial one
The conference opens at 10:00 a.m. with the inauguration and the welcome address by Shri Jayyannt Laps

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

okers and surveyors to state plainly what is working in the Authorised Economic Operator framework, what is not, and what must change. Interventions will be captured live and consolidated into a formal Outcome Document for submission to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, as India moves towards its AEO coverage targets for 2028. Themes include the trust-based framework, faceless examination, National E-Bond and Transfer of Ownership, Participating Government Agencies routing under SWIFT 2.0, and Customs Integrated Systems 2.0.

The afternoon: global suppliers, reform from the Department, and the flagship address
At 2:00 p.m., the Global Suppliers Panel, moderated by Shri Avinash Maheshwari of Geo-Chem Laboratories (Cotecna Group), brings the world's suppliers into candid conversation with India's buyers. It features Mr. Reece H. Cannady of the U.S. Grains & BioProducts Council, U.S.A.; Shri Vikash Sharma, Director, Godrej International Trading & Investment, Singapore;

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

odrej Industries Group, Aegis Vopak, Supreme Petrochem Ltd., VVF Limited, AWL Agri Business and Hindustan Unilever Limited. AGS 360, from Atlantic Global Shipping (AGS), is the Digital Partner for the Silver Jubilee celebrations, which will also mark its India launch — an integrated digital maritime information and intelligence application bringing port information, vessel tracking and port call estimates onto a single platform. Media Partners are Daily Shipping Times, EXIM and friends from the Logistics Media Ecosystem.

Shri Jayyannt Lapsiaa, President, AILBIEA, said: “We did not want a Silver Jubilee conference of speeches. We wanted a room where the trade says plainly what it needs, the Government hears it directly, and something leaves the room in writing. Twenty-five years have taught us that when industry and Government speak with trust, trade moves faster and the nation gains.”
The Silver Jubilee Evening follows, commencing at the muhurat of 6:21 p.m., with a special

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 61 return scrutiny is not mandatory before fraud-based input tax credit proceedings, leaving factual invoice disputes for adjudication.

Section 61 return scrutiny is not mandatory before fraud-based input tax credit proceedings, leaving factual invoice disputes for adjudication.Case-LawsGSTSection 61 return scrutiny is a pre-adjudicatory verification mechanism and is not a mandatory pr…

Section 61 return scrutiny is not mandatory before fraud-based input tax credit proceedings, leaving factual invoice disputes for adjudication.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 61 return scrutiny is a pre-adjudicatory verification mechanism and is not a mandatory prerequisite for tax-determination proceedings under Section 74A. Rule 99 applies only where return scrutiny has actually commenced. Independent verification alleging that works-contract sub-contractors were fictitious or non-existent may provide the factual foundation for fraud-based input tax credit proceedings. Disputes over the actual existence of suppliers, provision of services, and genuineness of invoices require evidentiary adjudication rather than threshold writ review. A show-cause notice should not ordinarily be challenged in writ jurisdiction where statutory adjudication remains available and no jurisdictional defect or recognised exception is established.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Regular bail in GST evasion prosecution followed completed investigation, documentary evidence, low interference risk, and anticipated trial delay.

Regular bail in GST evasion prosecution followed completed investigation, documentary evidence, low interference risk, and anticipated trial delay.Case-LawsGSTRegular bail in alleged GST-evasion proceedings involving suppression of online money-gaming …

Regular bail in GST evasion prosecution followed completed investigation, documentary evidence, low interference risk, and anticipated trial delay.
Case-Laws
GST
Regular bail in alleged GST-evasion proceedings involving suppression of online money-gaming receipts was granted after investigation had concluded. The High Court treated the documentary nature of the proposed evidence and the official status of witnesses as indicating negligible risk of evidence tampering or witness influence. It also considered the maximum punishment, Magistrate-triable nature of the offences, prolonged custody, societal roots of the accused, and the likelihood of trial delay. Bail was made subject to bonds and conditions against tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, leaving the country without permission, or misusing liberty.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Voluntary GST Payments During Investigation Require Statutory Formalities, Supporting Refund Where Coercion or Procedural Defects Exist

Voluntary GST Payments During Investigation Require Statutory Formalities, Supporting Refund Where Coercion or Procedural Defects ExistCase-LawsGSTVoluntary GST payments during investigation under section 74(5) require genuine voluntariness and payment…

Voluntary GST Payments During Investigation Require Statutory Formalities, Supporting Refund Where Coercion or Procedural Defects Exist
Case-Laws
GST
Voluntary GST payments during investigation under section 74(5) require genuine voluntariness and payment of the associated interest and penalty. DRC-03 payments lacking interest and penalty, coupled with absence of the rule 142(2) DRC-04 acknowledgment, may not qualify as voluntary payments. Where no prior demand or liability ascertainment exists and payment follows an unexplained direction to appear, recovery proceedings under section 79 do not cure the defect. Refund rejection was set aside, with refund plus interest directed, while issues in pending show-cause and adjudication proceedings remained open.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =