Goods and Services Tax

Omission of export-refund restriction requires pending integrated-tax refund claims to be assessed without the former eligibility bar.
Notes
GST
Omission of Rule 96(10) without a saving clause requires pending claims for refund of integrated tax paid on exports to be assessed without the former eligibility restriction. The Supreme Court treated the omission as applicable to proceedings pending on 08 October 2024, because no provision preserved the omitted sub-rule. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act does not save proceedings under an omitted rule, as it applies to repeal by a Central Act or Regulation rather than subordinate legislation. Independent refund conditions under the zero-rated supply, Section 54 and Rule 96 framework, including applicable procedures and limitation, continue to govern refund entitlement.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Interim arrest protection cannot survive dismissal of an unmaintainable anticipatory-bail application; GST arrest requires communicated statutory authorisation.
Notes
GST
Interim protection from arrest cannot survive dismissal of an anticipatory-bail application as not maintainable, because interim relief must remain ancillary to a pending substantive proceeding. Under the GST arrest framework, a summons does not itself make a person an accused or create a legally sustainable apprehension of arrest. Arrest requires the Commissioner's reasoned authorisation based on reasons to believe that a specified offence has been committed. That authorisation must be communicated before arrest, enabling the affected person to pursue anticipatory bail, judicial review, or other available remedies. Communication is a statutory procedural safeguard, not residual bail protection after dismissal.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Monetary-limit compliance governs departmental GST appeals; Commissioner authorisation alone does not establish an exception or permit merits review.
Case-Laws
GST
Monetary-limit compliance governs departmental GST appeals even where the Commissioner authorises an application under Section 112(3). Appeals below the prescribed threshold require the Revenue to specifically plead and establish a recognised exception under the applicable litigation-control framework. A bare assertion of the Commissioner's permission does not prove a residual exception without material demonstrating a case-specific recorded opinion. Maintainability must be determined before the underlying tax merits are considered. Where no recognised exception is established, a below-threshold departmental appeal is liable to dismissal at the admission stage, leaving the substantive tax dispute undecided.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Cash Ledger balances do not end GST interest for prior periods until debit discharges delayed GSTR-3B liabilities.
Case-Laws
GST
GST interest on delayed GSTR-3B liabilities remains payable on the cash component until the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited, even where sufficient funds were deposited and continuously available earlier. A ledger credit evidences deposit with the Government but does not discharge an identified tax liability; debit is required for payment. The proviso excluding continuously available cash-ledger balances from interest computation operates prospectively and does not apply to earlier periods. A show-cause notice causes no defect where the taxpayer received the demand computation, responded fully, and suffered no prejudice. Failure to provide a requested personal hearing breached statutory requirements, but remand was unnecessary absent surviving substantive prejudice. Interest demands remain subject to reconciliation and credit without double recovery.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Technical textile classification places laminated HDPE geomembrane under the lower GST rate from the effective date.
Case-Laws
GST
Laminated HDPE woven geomembrane used for waterproof pond lining, including Biofloc applications, is classified under tariff sub-heading 59111000 as a textile fabric for technical use. HDPE tapes and strips below 5 mm fall within Section XI, and their weaving produces textile fabric; lamination with plastic on both sides does not displace classification where the material serves a technical purpose under Chapter Note 8 to Chapter 59. The product attracted GST at 12 per cent up to 21 September 2025 and 5 per cent from 22 September 2025, following its placement under the relevant GST rate entries for tariff heading 5911.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST classification of outdoor playground and gym equipment distinguishes sports goods from physical-exercise equipment and bearings.
Case-Laws
GST
Outdoor playground equipment, including qualifying spare parts, is classified under tariff item 95069990 as sports goods and taxable at 5%. Outdoor gym equipment and its qualifying spare parts are classified under tariff item 95069190 as equipment for general physical exercise and taxable at 18%. Parts solely or principally used with Chapter 95 articles generally follow the equipment classification. Ball and roller bearings remain separately classifiable under Heading 8482 because that specific tariff entry prevails over the general parts classification; their applicable tariff entry depends on their specifications, and they are taxable at 18%.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST limitation turns on issuance of substantive notices and orders, not later electronic DRC summaries, preserving appellate review.
Case-Laws
GST
GST limitation under Section 74 turns on issuance of substantive show-cause notices and adjudication orders, while Rule 142 requires consequential electronic summaries in Forms GST DRC-01 and DRC-07. Later dates on those forms do not invalidate notices or Orders-in-Original issued within the applicable limitation period. Challenges involving fraud, suppression, supplier knowledge or collusion, input tax credit entitlement, and departmental evidence require statutory appellate scrutiny where no denial of hearing or patent jurisdictional defect exists. Merits remain open before the Appellate Authority.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rule 138B authorisation and alternative appellate remedies limited the writ challenge to confiscation proceedings involving scrap-goods transport.
Case-Laws
GST
Rule 138B permits physical verification of a conveyance by a proper officer authorised by the Commissioner; an authorisation-based challenge fails where the officer holds that authority and no jurisdictional defect is established. Writ jurisdiction despite an alternative statutory appeal remains confined to exceptional circumstances, including infringement of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to statutory validity. Where a fresh show-cause notice, personal hearing, consideration of the reply, and relevant detention, verification and registration-cancellation material are provided, complaints concerning relied-upon documents require appellate examination. The writ challenge to confiscation was dismissed, leaving the statutory appeal available.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate review.
Case-Laws
GST
Alternative statutory remedy under GST required disputes over reclassification of animal nutrition products from feed supplements to medicaments to be pursued through the appellate process. Alleged variance between the show cause notice and adjudication order, tariff classification, applicable notifications, and denial of hearing or cross-examination required factual examination and did not establish an apparent jurisdictional defect warranting writ intervention. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that avoidance of the prescribed pre-deposit was not a basis to bypass appeal, while permitting the statutory appeal and excluding the writ period for limitation.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ jurisdiction over CGST penalties requires a clear natural-justice breach; record-dependent challenges belong in statutory appeal.
Case-Laws
GST
Writ jurisdiction against a common CGST penalty order is unavailable where alleged natural-justice breaches are unsupported by any specific denial of hearing or non-consideration of material. Challenges concerning limitation, the initiating officer's competence, and penalty liability require examination of the adjudication record and statutory provisions within the appellate process; the writ petitions were therefore not entertained. Pre-deposit relief available under an earlier High Court ruling may be claimed only where its factual conditions and stipulated requirements are satisfied.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Anticipatory bail under GST requires a communicated arrest-authorisation order; summons alone make a pre-arrest petition premature.
Case-Laws
GST
Anticipatory bail under the CGST Act requires a communicated order authorising arrest. Summons issued during an inquiry into alleged ineligible input tax credit do not, by themselves, make the recipient an accused or establish a legally sustainable apprehension of arrest. The statutory foundation for pre-arrest protection is an arrest-authorisation order made after the required reasons to believe; pending investigation, searches, summons, and a contingent risk of arrest cannot replace that requirement. Petitions founded only on summons were premature where no such order had been passed and communicated, without addressing the underlying allegations or investigation.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Proof of statutory breach limits strict-liability transit penalties where consignee-address errors are bona fide and goods match documents.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 129 transit penalties may operate on a strict-liability basis, but still require proof of a statutory breach attracting the penalty. Where invoices, e-way bills and bilty documents matched the goods, the buyer was identifiable, and historical records supported use of its former address, a repeated consignee-address entry was treated as a bona fide documentary error. In the absence of evidence of a fictitious purchaser, diversion, clandestine unloading, value suppression, or tax evasion, the discrepancy did not establish a substantive transit violation. The transit penalty and consequential recovery were annulled, while tax lawfully payable on the supply remained unaffected.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Part B e-way bill exception protects initial intrastate movement to transporter premises from tax penalties.
Case-Laws
GST
Rule 138(3)'s third proviso permits Part B conveyance details to remain unfilled during the specified initial intrastate movement from a consignor's business premises to a transporter's premises for further transportation. The exception covers movement to a transporter's warehouse for consolidation before onward dispatch, rather than every short-distance journey. A permitted omission does not constitute an actual contravention attracting a Section 129 penalty, despite its overriding language. Appeals below the statutory monetary threshold may be admitted where a substantive issue concerning this exception and the resulting penalty warrants consideration on merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Cash Ledger balances do not discharge GST return liabilities until debit, sustaining interest on delayed return filing.
Case-Laws
GST
GST interest on self-assessed return liabilities is discharged only when the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited towards the identified liability; a sufficient unappropriated cash balance does not stop interest until belated GSTR-3B filing. The later Rule 88B(1) proviso excluding amounts credited by the due date and continuously retained in that ledger operates prospectively, not for earlier periods. Notice proceedings remain valid where the taxpayer received the demand basis and computation, gave detailed replies, and established no actual prejudice. Denial of a requested personal hearing breached section 75(4), but did not require remand where the record was complete, the remaining issue was legal, and no lost substantive opportunity was identified. Interest demands were sustained, subject to reconciliation to prevent double recovery; substantive refund claims failed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit conditions require actual tax payment, but supplier default alone cannot justify mechanical credit reversal.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 16(2)(c) makes actual payment of tax by the supplier a foundational condition for input tax credit and is constitutionally valid. Credit cannot, however, be denied mechanically merely because a supplier's registration was cancelled or its returns show nil or short tax liability. Adjudication must assess the genuineness of supply, recipient evidence, circumstances of supplier default, available recovery action against the supplier, and the applicable statutory framework. Proceedings under Section 74 must state the foundational facts establishing fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression by the recipient; supplier fraud cannot be attributed without a direct factual link. Pending and concluded matters require fresh adjudication or reconsideration with hearing and without coercive recovery until determination.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit conditions survive constitutional challenge, while retrospective supplier-cancellation demands require specific fraud findings and supporting facts.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit remains conditional on the supplier's payment of tax; the constitutional challenge to that condition and the request to read it down were rejected. A demand based on retrospective cancellation of supplier registrations must, however, establish the statutory elements of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to evade tax. General audit objections without supplier-wise invoices, cancellation dates, attributable credit, supporting material, or findings on the taxpayer's defence of genuine transactions and contemporaneous registrations do not provide the required factual and statutory foundation. The demand and consequential proceedings were set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication after notice and an effective hearing, without deciding the merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST registration restoration for return non-filing requires pending returns and statutory dues, allowing business operations to resume conditionally.
Case-Laws
GST
GST registration cancelled solely for non-filing of returns may be restored conditionally, since continued cancellation prevents invoicing and business operations and may hinder tax recovery. Restoration requires filing all pending returns and paying applicable tax, interest, fine and penalty within the stipulated period. Compliance enables restoration and permits final determination of tax liability through filed returns; non-compliance results in cancellation continuing.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Cash Ledger Credits Do Not End Delayed GST Interest Until Debited Against Return Liability
Case-Laws
GST
Interest on delayed GSTR-3B liabilities continues until the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited and the amount is credited to the electronic liability register; a cash-ledger credit alone is a deposit, not payment of an identified tax liability. The further proviso to Rule 88B(1), which excludes continuously available cash-ledger balances from interest computation, operates prospectively because it provides substantive relief without retrospective language. Failure to provide a requested personal hearing breaches Section 75(4), but does not require remand where no surviving prejudice, factual dispute, or unconsidered defence exists. A show-cause notice remains adequate where its basis was understood and fully answered without prejudice.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recurring-issue exception to GST appeal thresholds requires genuine wider implications; absent proof, the departmental appeal is not maintainable.
Case-Laws
GST
Board monetary-limit litigation policy permits a departmental GST appeal below the prescribed threshold only where a stated exclusion applies. The recurring-issue or interpretation exclusion requires genuine recurring or wider revenue implications; it does not cover every interpretative dispute, mere disagreement with an appellate order, or a general need to construe a provision. As no recurring or cascading implication was pleaded or established, the Revenue appeal against penalty deletion following Section 128A relief was dismissed as not maintainable. Whether that relief could be granted without the prescribed application remained open.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Advisory on “Multistate Registration” Facility for GST Registration
GST
Dated:- 3-10-2026

1. It is informed that an option for “Multistate Registration” has been introduced. The functionality enables taxpayers to apply for registration in multiple States/UTs simultaneously. Taxpayers seeking GST registration in more than one State/UT under the same PAN can use this functionality. Currently, the functionality is available only for Normal Taxpayers.

2. A “Multistate Registration” tab has been introduced in the homepage of the Common Portal, where Taxpayers can select multiple States/UTs for registration. Upon selection of the required States/UTs, a Master TRN is generated.

3. Using the Master TRN, the applicant can prov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST refund withholding under Section 54(11) remains available during anti-evasion proceedings without a separate judicial stay.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 54(11) of the CGST Act permits withholding an export IGST refund where the underlying refund order is subject to appeal or other pending proceedings and, after hearing the taxable person, the Commissioner independently concludes that release would adversely affect revenue because of fraud or malfeasance. This statutory safeguard operates without a separate judicial stay; a proposed appeal alone is insufficient, but an already commenced anti-evasion investigation may qualify as pending proceedings. Material concerning allegedly non-genuine or non-operational suppliers and unestablished goods movement supported the withholding. Questions on supply genuineness remained for GSTAT; withholding was sustained and writ relief refused.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Resolution-plan extinguishment bars unfiled GST dues and permits writ review despite a statutory appellate remedy.
Case-Laws
GST
Approved resolution plans bind government authorities, extinguishing pre-approval statutory dues not lodged in insolvency proceedings or provided for in the plan, where the plan covers known and unknown, assessed and unassessed claims. Such extinguishment prevents subsequent GST demand notices, adjudication and recovery because determination cannot survive independently of the extinguished liability. The CGST first-charge provision yields to the IBC's overriding effect, and liquidation cannot revive the liability. Writ jurisdiction remains available despite an appellate remedy where proceedings lack jurisdiction and the dispute is a pure legal issue on admitted facts; a pre-deposit appeal need not be pursued.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 74 fraud allegations must be particularised; an ITC mismatch alone cannot sustain a notice for wrongful credit.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 74 of the HPGST Act requires a show cause notice to state the foundational facts showing that wrongful availment or utilisation of input tax credit resulted from fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax. Bare, alternative recitals of those expressions, without identifying the taxpayer's precise conduct and linking it to the alleged default, do not meet that requirement. An ITC mismatch or short payment alone cannot justify Section 74 unless the notice records supporting reasons and facts. The High Court set aside the defective notice, permitted a fresh notice within 60 days without limitation bar, and kept the challenge to ITC provisions open.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bail in CGST prosecution: completed investigation and documentary evidence supported release subject to safeguards against trial interference.
Case-Laws
GST
Bail in a CGST prosecution involving alleged diversion of online-gaming merchant funds was granted because pre-conviction detention is not punitive and must secure attendance at trial. Completed investigation, filing of the complaint, documentary evidence, Magistrate-triable offences, and absence of criminal antecedents or material showing witness tampering, flight risk, repeat offending, or exceptional circumstances meant continued custody was unjustified. Delay likely to prevent trial completion within a reasonable time further supported release, subject to attendance and non-interference safeguards.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory GST appeals remain the appropriate remedy where exemption claims lack substantiation during adjudication proceedings.
Case-Laws
GST
GST demand challenges founded on claims that supplies were exempt fuelwood and charcoal require substantiation during adjudication; where that defence is not properly supported, the statutory appeal is the appropriate remedy. The taxpayer may clarify an apparently incorrect reference to Form GSTR-8A before the Appellate Authority by filing supporting material. Despite substantial recovery of the confirmed demand, an appeal filed within the permitted period must be decided without applying limitation.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =